🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.